Weather | Traffic | Surf | Maps | Webcam


   
 
Forums Visitors Guide Shopping Classifieds Autos Homes Jobs Entertainment Sports Today's Paper Home

 News
 Metro | Latest News
 North County
 Temecula/Riverside
 Tijuana/Border
 California
 Nation
 Mexico
 World
 Obituaries
 Today's Paper
 AP Headlines
 Business
 Technology
 Biotech
 Markets
 In Depth
 Iraq / Afghanistan
 Pension Crisis
 Special Reports
 Video
 Multimedia
 Photo Galleries
 Topics
 Education
 Features
 Health | Fitness
 Military
 Politics
 Science
 Solutions
 Opinion
 Columnists
 Steve Breen
 Forums
 Weblogs
 Communities
 U-T South County
 U-T East County
 Solutions
 Calendar
 Just Fix It
 Services
 Weather
 Traffic
 Surf Report
 Archives
 E-mail Newsletters
 Wireless | RSS
 Noticias en Enlace
 Internet Access

 Sponsored Links

Key Indian party delays decision on government bid for support on U.S. civilian nuclear deal

ASSOCIATED PRESS

7:13 a.m. July 3, 2008

NEW DELHI – The Indian government's bid to secure political support for a civilian nuclear deal with the United States stalled Thursday when a key regional party asked for more time to make a decision.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has been wooing the Socialist Party because its backing would offset the potential loss of communist allies who have threatened to withdraw their support in India's Parliament for the ruling coalition if Singh moves ahead with the nuclear deal.

The communist parties are not part of the ruling coalition, which is led by Singh's Congress Party, but their support is crucial to its stability. Without that support, the government could topple and face an early election later this year.

Mulayam Singh, the Socialist Party chief, held talks Thursday with his supporters and told reporters that he “needs to consult nuclear scientists before making a final decision.”

The government assured Singh's party on Wednesday that there was nothing in the agreement with the U.S. that would place an embargo on India's right to carry out a nuclear test or affect India's decision-making in foreign policy, according to a news release by the prime minister's office.

Meanwhile, Democratic Rep. Gary Ackerman, chairman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on South Asia, told Indian leaders they needed to sign the deal soon or risk losing the opportunity.

“The calendar is running quickly,” Ackerman said, according the Press Trust of India news agency.

On Thursday, a Congressional delegation, led by Ackerman, met Shyam Saran, the prime minister's special envoy on the nuclear deal, and Shivshankar Menon, India's top bureaucrat in the foreign ministry.

Indian communist party leaders oppose the deal because they argue it would give the U.S. too much influence over their country's foreign policy and would undermine India's weapons program, and ultimately threaten national sovereignty.

An agreement with Washington would reverse three decades of U.S. policy by allowing the shipment of atomic fuel and technology to India, which has not signed international nonproliferation accords but has tested nuclear weapons. India, in exchange, would open its civilian reactors to international inspections.

The deal has been hailed as the cornerstone of a new strategic relationship between the U.S. and India.

For India to move ahead with the deal it needs to sign a separate deal with the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency before the U.S. Congress can approve the pact.


 Sponsored Links







Quicklinks
Restaurants Bars
Hotels Autos
Shopping Health
Eldercare Singles
Business Listings
Free Newsletters


Guides
Vegas Spas/Salon
Travel Weddings
Wine Old Town
Baja Catering
Casino Home Imp.
Golf SD North
Gaslamp


© Copyright 1995-2008 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. • A Copley Newspaper Site