Weather | Traffic | Surf | Maps | Webcam


   
 
Forums Visitors Guide Shopping Classifieds Autos Homes Jobs Entertainment Sports Today's Paper Home

 News
 Metro | Latest News
 North County
 Temecula/Riverside
 Tijuana/Border
 California
 Nation
 Mexico
 World
 Obituaries
 Today's Paper
 AP Headlines
 Business
 Technology
 Biotech
 Markets
 In Depth
 Iraq / Afghanistan
 Pension Crisis
 Special Reports
 Video
 Multimedia
 Photo Galleries
 Topics
 Education
 Features
 Health | Fitness
 Military
 Politics
 Science
 Solutions
 Opinion
 Columnists
 Steve Breen
 Forums
 Weblogs
 Communities
 U-T South County
 U-T East County
 Solutions
 Calendar
 Just Fix It
 Services
 Weather
 Traffic
 Surf Report
 Archives
 E-mail Newsletters
 Wireless | RSS
 Noticias en Enlace
 Internet Access

 Sponsored Links

San Diego's Pension Crisis
Auditors hired by city fear lawsuit by Aguirre

UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

December 7, 2007

San Diego's private auditors notified the city this week that discussions with City Attorney Michael Aguirre have soured to the point that they fear he might sue them, a top administrator said yesterday in a confidential memo.

It's a development that could cast a shadow on the city's short-term budget prospects, which had brightened this year as three years of delayed financial audits were issued in quick succession between March and October.

In the memo, Jay Goldstone, the city's chief operating officer, warns that the tension between Aguirre and the auditors, from the Sacramento firm Macias Gini & O'Connell, could “have significant impacts on both the timing and costs” of future audits.

The dispute illustrates the sensitive relationship between auditors and their clients, the delicate nature of the city's financial position, and how concerns over one item in a detailed financial statement can upend the process.

Macias' auditors, who handled two of the recently released audits, are working on the 2006 and 2007 financial statements, tools that credit-rating agencies use to determine San Diego's fiscal fitness.

The city's numbers have been called into question because of federal investigations into San Diego's finances and the eventual acknowledgment of glaring errors in the 2002 financial statements.

Without reliable figures, San Diego was unable to secure favorable rates for public bonds, and has put off costly projects for years.

The city's ratings were suspended or downgraded as the scale of its financial missteps, focused on the pension system and misleading market disclosures, became clear. San Diego's ability to borrow won't improve until the ratings rise.

That could take longer if the current audit is interrupted. It's a possibility Goldstone raises in the memo – addressed to a three-member City Council committee that oversees the city's audits – in which he recounts a Tuesday conversation with James V. Godsey, a partner in the Macias firm.

Goldstone said Godsey told him that Aguirre sought a meeting with the firm's auditors and recommended that they bring an attorney.

The seemingly innocuous request raises warning flags for auditors, who can lose credibility if there's any hint that their objectivity has been breached.

The question of auditor independence lies at the center of the city's financial problems over the past decade. An internal auditor left under a cloud, and San Diego's former outside auditors settled a lawsuit by the city.

Goldstone said Godsey labeled Aguirre's request an “implied threat,” but said it fell short of giving him reason to believe a lawsuit “is probable.”

Still, Goldstone wrote that he interpreted Godsey's comments to mean the firm “may no longer be able to complete” the expected audits.

Aguirre, reached on his cell phone, refused to take questions about the memo, his statements to Godsey or his concerns about the city's financial admissions. Godsey didn't return a call to his office for comment.

Councilman Kevin Faulconer, chairman of the Audit Committee, said yesterday that he would seek out Aguirre and Godsey for their versions of the events. He also wants the auditors to inform the panel “if they think they have been compromised.”

The dispute is related to a tax matter that the city attorney publicly addressed at a meeting earlier in the day. The issue involves the pension system, and an expense that Aguirre on Monday warned must be noted in the 2005 financial statements audited by the Macias firm.

The retirement fund violated an obscure tax rule for more than a decade, laying out more than $8 million on benefits that exceed Internal Revenue Service limits on pension payments. San Diego opted to pay the excess benefits out of city accounts, a solution allowed under federal and state laws.

Fund representatives have been talking about the excess payments with the IRS for more than a year, but Aguirre and Councilwoman Donna Frye haven't been satisfied with their approach – or its effect on the city's already-strained finances.

Both sparred with pension administrator David Wescoe at the morning meeting.

Aguirre told Wescoe that the system is erring in trying “to make something work that's not workable.” He also advised Wescoe to submit more information to the IRS.


Jennifer Vigil: (619) 718-5069; jennifer.vigil@uniontrib.com


 Sponsored Links







Quicklinks
Restaurants Bars
Hotels Autos
Shopping Health
Eldercare Singles
Business Listings
Free Newsletters


Guides
Vegas Spas/Salon
Travel Weddings
Wine Old Town
Baja Catering
Casino Home Imp.
Golf SD North
Gaslamp


© Copyright 1995-2008 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. • A Copley Newspaper Site