Weather | Traffic | Surf | Maps | Webcam


   
 
Forums Visitors Guide Shopping Classifieds Autos Homes Jobs Entertainment Sports Today's Paper Home

 News
 Metro | Latest News
 North County
 Temecula/Riverside
 Tijuana/Border
 California
 Nation
 Mexico
 World
 Obituaries
 Today's Paper
 AP Headlines
 Business
 Technology
 Biotech
 Markets
 In Depth
 Iraq / Afghanistan
 Pension Crisis
 Special Reports
 Video
 Multimedia
 Photo Galleries
 Topics
 Education
 Features
 Health | Fitness
 Military
 Politics
 Science
 Solutions
 Opinion
 Columnists
 Steve Breen
 Forums
 Weblogs
 Communities
 U-T South County
 U-T East County
 Solutions
 Calendar
 Just Fix It
 Services
 Weather
 Traffic
 Surf Report
 Archives
 E-mail Newsletters
 Wireless | RSS
 Noticias en Enlace
 Internet Access

 Sponsored Links

Appeals court annuls ruling that ordered U.S. teen to Mexico


UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

August 18, 2008

A teenage U.S. citizen avoided what amounted to temporary banishment when a state appeals court reversed a San Diego Superior Court judge's decision ordering him to continue living with his grandparents in Tijuana and not come back to the United States while on probation.

According to court documents, the boy, referred to as “James C.,” was 17 when he attempted to drive a stolen vehicle through the San Ysidro Port of Entry in May 2007. Customs officers inspecting the vehicle found illegal immigrants hidden inside, and the boy was arrested. After his arrest, he told officers that he knew the vehicle had been tampered with, but that he had been threatened into driving it.

Juvenile Court placed the boy on probation, but with an odd border twist. According to court documents, the order issued by Judge Francis M. Devaney committed the boy to the Camp Barrett juvenile detention facility for up to a year, but put off the sentence provided the boy stayed out of the United States:

“You will be returned to your grandparents,” language in the court documents reads. “They'll return you to Mexico. Tijuana. You will not enter this country while on probation to this court . . . I don't care if you are a citizen. I don't care if you have papers. You have no business, as terms of probation, coming back into the country after what you did in this case.”

The order threatened the boy with detention if he returned to the United States.

Last week, the 4th District Court of Appeal in San Diego ruled the Juvenile Court order was unconstitutional, with a probation condition that “impermissibly infringed upon the minor's constitutional rights of freedom of travel, association and assembly.”

“It was outrageous,” said attorney James Crawford, who represented the boy in his appeal. “He is a U.S. citizen . . . Telling a minor that he has to live in Mexico and can't enter the United States is nothing more than banishment.”

The boy lived in Tijuana with his grandparents, his legal guardians, but went to school in the United States, Crawford said. According to court documents, the boy had no criminal history. He has since been released to his grandparents in Tijuana, but is free to come and go.

While James C.'s case is unusual, it's not unique. A similar case occurred in Northern California in the early 1990s, when a court suspended a minor's commitment to the California Youth Authority on the condition that he live in Iran with his parents for two years. An appeals court ruled the order was unconstitutional.


Leslie Berestein: (619) 542-4579; leslie.berestein@uniontrib.com

 Sponsored Links







Quicklinks
Restaurants Bars
Hotels Autos
Shopping Health
Eldercare Singles
Business Listings
Free Newsletters


Guides
Vegas Spas/Salon
Travel Weddings
Wine Old Town
Baja Catering
Casino Home Imp.
Golf SD North
Gaslamp


© Copyright 1995-2008 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. • A Copley Newspaper Site